Media

Crysis 3 - Fields TrainsCrysis 3 - CavesCrysis 3 - Nanosuit vs PingerCrysis 3 - AirportCrysis 3 - Fields - NanosuitCrysis 3 - Fields - Psycho vs StalkersCrysis 3 - Fields - Cell vs StalkersCrysis 3 Weapons - TyphoonCrysis 3 Weapons - Reaper CannonCrysis 3 Weapons - Incinerator

Latest News

Community

Crysis 1 Interview: Sten Huebler

by Cry-Tom Sep 12, 2011 / 09:01

Crysis 1 Interview: Sten Huebler

Introduce yourself!  What is your name, job position at Crytek, how long have you worked here, and why did you join Crytek in the first place?

My name is Sten Huebler.  I was Lead Level Designer for Crysis 1 and Lead Game Designer for Crysis 2. I am at Crytek for almost 10 years now. I started in December 2001 back in Coburg and have already worked on our debut title Far Cry at the time.

I was very impressed by the X-Isle demo Crytek released earlier in 2001. I had finished my university degree shortly before. My hope was that at Crytek I could make my way into the industry and work on a cool, inspiring game. The ideas behind X-Isle and later Far Cry were very much fitting to my personal taste, and it was a great opportunity to work with an international team, to be able to learn a lot and gain experience.

You were involved in Crysis 1, what did you do on the project?

I have been working on Crysis 1 almost right from the start. At the beginning there was much documentation and design work, as I collaborated with our Lead Designer Jack Mamais on preparing the Game Design Document and Mission briefs.

Later on I was leading a team of Level Designers, crafting the levels of the single player campaign. I looked after the basic structure of the levels, the mission objectives, the integration of the story in the levels, how the levels connected with each other, the player leading, gameplay challenges and difficulty balancing.

Did you ever think Crysis 1 would one day be available on consoles while making it?

Yes, already in the concept phase we have been thinking about it, trying to design the game to make sure it could be shipped on consoles as well. At some point during the development we noticed that a potential console version would take more time than we had estimated and focused out attention largely on the PC. We tried to make the best PC game we could think of, creating very large and open levels that could be played in many different ways.

Since most of our levels became quite large, I had doubts in the end if Crysis 1 could be ported to the consoles easily. I was afraid that a console version would have required us to rework the Crysis 1 levels to a large extent, possibly splitting them into several parts. Luckily this was not needed, as our engineers worked their magic. While developing Crysis 2 and rewriting CryEngine to the consoles we learned a lot and freed up the necessary resources to make it run. We also benefited much from the knowledge of our UK studio in Nottingham, which is mainly responsible for realizing the project. The guys there have a ton of experience and worked on consoles titles as the Time Splitters series before and have done a fantastic job porting Crysis 1 for the consoles!

All our efforts together allowed for the levels to stay as big and open as they have been on the PC version.

Why didn’t this happen sooner?

When CryEngine originally was created, it was very much built with the PC in mind. Many systems and parts of the architecture had to be changed and adapted to a console environment. This takes time, since we wanted to get it right and deliver a console experience living up to our own expectations, but also the expectations of our fans and community.

We were afraid that getting our console code ready could take too long, releasing Crysis 1 on consoles much later than the original PC version. So after Crysis 1 shipped, we immediately focused on Crysis 2 and developed it multiplatform right from the start.

After our work on Crysis 2 was finished and our technology is now ready for consoles, it was our desire to release Crysis 1 finally on consoles as well. Most of the work was done at Crytek UK in Nottingham and we are very happy in how it turned out. It’s not without reason that some of the technically most competent games are only released late in the cycle for a console generation.  

How did we manage to get that tech working on consoles, what sort of sacrifices were required?

Firstly we had to reduce the memory used by the assets in the game. We used smart algorithms to compress the used meshes for our geometry, the terrain height maps and terrain textures, the sprites that are used to display our vegetation in the distance and the animations used for our characters.

We also optimized how the memory was used and organized in our engine, which allowed us to increase the Streaming Buffer, which was very essential for making our large levels work.

Many of the effects now showcased in games are done via fullscreen shader passes. For example to convey motion blur, the render information of the whole screen is being processed with algorithms creating the desired effect. We already improved those algorithms in Crysis 2, but further optimized this for the Crysis 1 console version in order to save performance and processing time.

We refined the Occlusion Buffer we use to detect which objects we do not need to render since they would be occluded from other objects that are in front of them and used Reprojection methods to predict where the player might look next in order to avoid objects popping suddenly into place.

We also optimized our vegetation a lot. We reduced some of the poly counts and adjusted the used methods for blending the vegetation into each other and making it fade out on the edges.  We also optimized many of our objects and vehicles in the game, tried to reduce the amount of textures and polygons to increase the performance where possible.

Of course we also had to optimize our levels as well. With more careful placement of the objects and the vegetation in the game, we were able to reduce the overall rendering time needed. We also looked at our AI counts and scripting, to prevent large amount of AI being active the player could actually not engage.

How does Crysis 1 stack up to Crysis 2 as an overall game?

Luckily we had the opportunity to improve Crysis 1 for the console version with what we have learned from developing Crysis 2. The controls and interface are more straightforward, allowing the player to control the Nansuit smoothly to focus more on the game and action, without struggling with the controls. We drastically improved the lighting for all levels, updated and added new particle effects.

I think for a game that originally has been released almost 4 years ago, Crysis 1 stacks up quite well and matches up to current titles.

What do you think Crysis 2 players (who have never played the original) will gain from playing Crysis 1?  Why should they play it?

It’s an important part of the Crysis trilogy, providing a player a better picture of the Crysis universe. They will get to know Prophet from a completely different angle, unraveling the mysteries of Ling-Shan together with him and the rest of the Raptor team.

It features large, open levels that can be played in many different ways, with lots of stuff to explore in very interactive and destroyable environments with clever AI the player has to outsmart in order to defeat them. They can drive a wide selection of vehicles, use cutting-edge high-tech weaponry and even participate in an epic tank battle taking place in one of the valleys of Ling-Shan. Later in the game they will enter a massive strange alien structure and witness the island completely freezing over, changing the gameplay greatly and requiring new strategies in order to succeed.

I think it is a must for any Crysis 2 fan out there, that hasn’t played Crysis 1 so far.

24 Comments

Your comment was posted successfully

Show:
|
  • normahn
    #1

    May 28, 2013 / 08:06

    i got the crysis1 AND I AMVERY ADDICTED AT THAT VIDEO GAME UNTIL NOW I AM STILL PLAYIN IT and its cool and i started playin it at july 7 2010 LOL I AM SO HAPPYI GOT THAT VIDEOGAME

  • in-vino-veritas
    #2

    Jan 07, 2012 / 14:48

    Please fix the trophy set on ps3:

    - tooled up
    - dedication

  • Shockwave82
    #3

    Oct 25, 2011 / 13:30

    Can we expect this game (crysis1 console edition) on PC

  • NANOPROv2
    #4

    Oct 14, 2011 / 21:56

    No offense to anyone in particuler, but though you make good games, you guys over at crytek generally suck, at least when it comes to customer support. You seriously have to change that because you make almost no effort to help us out.

  • Shinigami07
    #5

    Oct 11, 2011 / 22:00

    Its always cool to see how developers are able to make these games work and play great. I can't wait and see what they do for Crysis 3.

  • FFrags
    #6

    Oct 11, 2011 / 20:46

    Dame

  • Sergey Lander
    #7

    Sep 23, 2011 / 08:47

    Good interview, but I think it will be more questions. No doubt, Sten Huebler is very talented level designer. Best regards from http://mycrysis.com.ua

  • cosmiciceblast78
    #8

    Sep 22, 2011 / 00:23

    Quote

    @ NomadisNOTMAD

    My problem is that outdated consoles have become the main development platform for Crytek.
    You sure will answer now "youre a dumb Pc elitist bla bla" but youre missing the point.
    Crytek stood for progress in videogame graphics.
    Since X-isle they tried to push the bar on what modern hardware can do. Consoles are the wrong target hardware for that ambition. Thats not fanboyism or pc-elitism or what ever.. its simple logic. Besides that no other company did that (ecept ID since 2004) time almost stood still in videogame grfx since 2007. What angers me the most though is that Crytek still pretends to push the bar... but with Crysis 2 and the badly implemented Dx11 Patch and high res textures.. they proved themselves wrong.
    You know i like to see things get better all the time.. mobile phones get better every year.. tvs..and everything else... just the videogames stay the same because of Sony and Microsoft and overcapitalized companys like Crytek.
    And that is what bothers me.


    i agree!! XD

  • cosmiciceblast78
    #9

    Sep 22, 2011 / 00:21

    Quote

    i feel that crytek made a bad choice. games can always look better on pc than consoles cause computers always improve and upgrade faster than consoles. i feel that all they care about is making money rather than a a great game. if your goal/ motivation is money, it cripples creativity and the original idea. they should spend 5 years on crysis 3 before they release it. its nice that now everybody can play crysis 1 but i feel that it loses value.they should make pc version of crysis with extras that consoles dont have since pc's can take the better visuals and extra long levels.

    i love the first crysis better than crysis 2. they should combine horizontal gameplay from crysis 1 and vertcal gameplay from crysis 2 to make crysis 3!!!!

  • cosmiciceblast78
    #10

    Sep 22, 2011 / 00:18

    i feel that crytek made a bad choice. games can always look better on pc than consoles cause computers always improve and upgrade faster than consoles. i feel that all they care about is making money rather than a a great game. if your goal/ motivation is money, it cripples creativity and the original idea. they should spend 5 years on crysis 3 before they release it. its nice that now everybody can play crysis 1 but i feel that it loses value.they should make pc version of crysis with extras that consoles dont have since pc's can take the better visuals and extra long levels.

  • gellyfish
    #11

    Sep 15, 2011 / 16:07

    amazing i can finaly play crysis just hope its not like crysis 2 on ps3 running at 14 to 25 frams a sec................................

  • alex265
    #12

    Sep 14, 2011 / 11:29

    agasg

  • bigboulder
    #13

    Sep 14, 2011 / 10:48

    @ Starscreamers:

    Featurewise youre right.
    Pc games dont look way more better like totally different games. And that is because of consoles being the lead platforms. But The Resolution and some stuff like AA AF make a way better and calm picture. Consoleversions are full with jaggies and really lowres textures. So the differences are in detail for now. With battlefield 3 and crysis on consoles you will see higher differences for sure.

  • Kingdudman
    #14

    Sep 13, 2011 / 20:37

    I would like the new version come to pc too. Without all the cuts.

  • Starscreamers-19
    #15

    Sep 13, 2011 / 16:40

    Quote

    @ NomadisNOTMAD

    My problem is that outdated consoles have become the main development platform for Crytek.
    You sure will answer now "youre a dumb Pc elitist bla bla" but youre missing the point.
    Crytek stood for progress in videogame graphics.
    Since X-isle they tried to push the bar on what modern hardware can do. Consoles are the wrong target hardware for that ambition. Thats not fanboyism or pc-elitism or what ever.. its simple logic. Besides that no other company did that (ecept ID since 2004) time almost stood still in videogame grfx since 2007. What angers me the most though is that Crytek still pretends to push the bar... but with Crysis 2 and the badly implemented Dx11 Patch and high res textures.. they proved themselves wrong.
    You know i like to see things get better all the time.. mobile phones get better every year.. tvs..and everything else... just the videogames stay the same because of Sony and Microsoft and overcapitalized companys like Crytek.
    And that is what bothers me.



    The thing is dude, they changed there mind, graphics were looking better on the PC then consoles so the game was'nt being held back. However, every game that is supposed to look better on the PC never really does, have you ever seen a side to side comparison, I see no difference not even on the battlefield games

  • bigboulder
    #16

    Sep 13, 2011 / 12:39

    @ NomadisNOTMAD

    My problem is that outdated consoles have become the main development platform for Crytek.
    You sure will answer now "youre a dumb Pc elitist bla bla" but youre missing the point.
    Crytek stood for progress in videogame graphics.
    Since X-isle they tried to push the bar on what modern hardware can do. Consoles are the wrong target hardware for that ambition. Thats not fanboyism or pc-elitism or what ever.. its simple logic. Besides that no other company did that (ecept ID since 2004) time almost stood still in videogame grfx since 2007. What angers me the most though is that Crytek still pretends to push the bar... but with Crysis 2 and the badly implemented Dx11 Patch and high res textures.. they proved themselves wrong.
    You know i like to see things get better all the time.. mobile phones get better every year.. tvs..and everything else... just the videogames stay the same because of Sony and Microsoft and overcapitalized companys like Crytek.
    And that is what bothers me.


  • Plastik64
    #17

    Sep 12, 2011 / 21:41

    I really think crytek wanted to release crysis games on the next generation of consoles , but this gen is running on vapor now with the tech inside of these little boxes.

    This console cycle is lasting too long for crytek to wait but how much do you want to bet they will get released on the next consoles in a couple years.

    Well lets hope crysis 3 is that uber pc game we all dreamed about with all these console cash in make overs.

    Crytek needs to remember who their strong hardcore fan base is and to why some of us build these high end rigs.

  • CrysisKnight1995
    #18

    Sep 12, 2011 / 20:45

    Quote

    LOL

    So many questions weren't asked-
    1) How will this affect development of Crysis 3?
    2) What do you think the PC gamers of Crysis 1 should feel about this?
    3) Will Crysis Wars be ported over too?

    oh wait, those questions were to obtuse :/



    1 - They still haven't announce Crysis 3, so they can't comment on that.

    2 - PC Elitist will talk crap like always.

    3 - I don't think so.

  • CrysisKnight1995
    #19

    Sep 12, 2011 / 20:30

    Quote

    So basically:

    Reducing everything so much and dumb it down like hell so consoles can runt it.
    Great... and still this "remastered" version couldnt even touch the original on pc @ medium settings i guess.

    You know its sad Sten that the pc gamers must wait for talented modders to make your games look like you guys have promised them to look like in the first place ( Blackfire and MalDO). Or show you that even your old engine can surpass everything out there even today (Mster,Rygel etc..)
    Why dont you start programming for gameboys next?
    I mean you dont wanna push the limits like you did with X-isle and Far Cry anymore..
    Money kills progress Sten... thats what your statement is tellin us.




    And your problem is?

  • GenaroX
    #20

    Sep 12, 2011 / 12:54

    what i wanna know is where they left crysis 1 story: nomad and psicho survived? how the hell prophet get out of that island? and what happened with rossental? good interview tough.