what about

1) make a 100% pc build with big open level and the latest graphics settings, add the mp from far cry1 and
2) port this build in smaller and weaker form to the current 360 and ps3. Better yet, wait one more year and port the same pc build with pausible the same size levels and lower the graphics a bitt so it can run on the next gen of console! This way you got yourself a nice game on the releasday of one of the next gen consoles and the pc gamer get a kickass crysis3 on pc next year, BEFORE THE CONSOLES!! it been awhile that the pc get a game first....Epic Gamers is making a pc game as we speak, which they will then port to the next gen consoles!!

Think about it Crytek and dont listen to ea on this one! Invest in crysis 3, launch it on pc - without origin please - and then port it to the xbox4 and the ps4

LOL EA don't care about PC gaming, they're purely in it for the money, and the fact Origin lets them sell for high prices and keep a massive percentage of it as profit. If releasing on PC first were profitable, they'd sure as hell do it, but it's not. It'd result in all the console gamers getting butthurt and crying on forums, and then by the time it did hit the consoles, nobody would even remember it. You'd have to spend a ton on marketing just to get people talking about it again.

Ea never ever liked the pc segment, just like Microsoft. Microsoft lett G4W down and made the worst console ever!
If you communicate this to the consolegamer that they will get a better game with longer development time and it will be available on the next gen, I think they dont really mind! How long did the pc gamer had to wait for Alan Wake? Which was a pc only game from the start?

Why marketing? Put i on steam and you got millions of possible pc gamer who are willing to buy C3. EA got origin, so their is your second platform. Make some interview with gametrailers.com and IGN.com and voila...C3 get enough attention for the pc. Micrsoft and sony will take care of the rest when it comes to promoting for the next gen. Strategy and communicatie is key in the go to market. And EA or Crytek is seriously doing it wrong. You actually expect me to spend money on part3 after buying part 2? Really? They messed up and lost my and many other peoples faith when it comes to this serie

You guys may want to start a new topic about marketing Crysis 3 or something, rather than discussing content features...

Lol nope. The only way to do it properly is to take account of the fact that the nanosuit's ability to create physical force changes with the suit mode.

If they do it (badly) like Crysis 2, then they can stick with the 'simple' version, but that doesn't make my way overcomplicated, it makes their whole nanosuit oversimplified.

i also liked walking around, glowing red in the game

i'm afraid Crysis 3 will be almost Crysis 2 except new locations, weapons and may be few new Cefs.
i bought Crysis 2 with no doubts at the moment i saw it in shop and regreted much later. When Crysis 3 will be released i will download it from torrent this time to be sure i want to pay money for the game. i wont buy Crysis 2 version 2.1, no any more...

Unfortunately, the game seems pretty much like this right now. Of course it's still a year away, but it doesn't seem too promising. We might need to wait for Crysis 4 to get a game that matches the first one in quality, since the game will/would certainly be in next gen consoles.

you know, Metro 2033, Battlefield3, Whitcher2 etc - this games are on PC and consoles as well. but why aren't this games ugly console sh1t? miracle? no, just developers respect ALL platforms.
Crytek CAN make good game if they want to and greedy bastards from EA let them do that i believe

Yeah, I have a feeling that EA wants to take the series to COD-like direction.