| Author |
Message |
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 27, 2011 /09:26 |
|
I too would buy Crysis Warhead in a heartbeat if it came to consoles as I believe would millions of other people would. I just really want this to happen SOON!
|
|
|
|
|
|
phsycokid
Joined: 03 27, 2011 /11:09
Posts: 56
Location: United Kingdom
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 27, 2011 /10:14 |
|
bigboulder wrote: It would make sense to focus on the PC again and get back to the roots of the company by improving the technology instead on focussing to convert old PC games for old consoles. i completely agree. i personally think that the 'press start' bug honestly ruined the prospect of crysis on console. I kinda feel that Crytek is Ditching the PC fans who made the company where it is, but hey thats my opinion. What do you guys think??
|
|
|
|
|
 |
FBI_Shogo
Joined: 03 28, 2011 /07:42
Posts: 27
Location: United States
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 28, 2011 /03:35 |
|
phsycokid wrote:
i completely agree. i personally think that the 'press start' bug honestly ruined the prospect of crysis on console. I kinda feel that Crytek is Ditching the PC fans who made the company where it is, but hey thats my opinion. What do you guys think?? Well, coming from the viewpoint of a console gamer who started on Crysis 2 before playing Crysis, I feel that Crytek owes it to both the PC and console gaming communities to deliver an incredible follow up that anyone on any platform can agree to being "successful". In the eyes of console gamers, Crysis 2 was a success, but in the eyes of PC gamers it failed to deliver that same caliber of gameplay from the original Crysis, which I do agree with but at the same time I still feel like Crysis 2 is a great game in it's own right (atleast when you compare it to other console FPS games like CoD). So for Crysis 3, they should make the game open ended like in the first, even if that means the graphics aren't as good as Crysis 2 when it comes to consoles. Crytek had to drastically reduce the resolution amongst other things when they released the original Crysis to get the game running on CryEngine 3 without experiencing a massive FPS drop, but now that console gamers have been able to witness (IMO from a technical standpoint) the greatest FPS game ever made, fans are going to expect the bar that Crysis 1 was at for their next game, not 2. If the PC version ends up being way better, and if they have to cut some things for the console release, then so be it. I just want Crysis 3 to be as awesome as the original from a gameplay perspective and as awesome as the sequel from a narrative perspective. Crysis 3 will undoubtedly be released on the next gen console, so who knows where technology will be by that point and maybe this entire discussion will become moot. I can only hope that Crytek considers both communities this time when working on Crysis 3 so that way everyone has something to be happy about :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 28, 2011 /11:02 |
|
I don't think converting an older game like Crysis Warhead from Cryengine 2 to Cryengine 3 so it can run on consoles is in anyway "ditching the PC" fans. I mean the PC gamers still got the best version of the games(Crysis and Crysis Warhead if that comes too). It's not like making a console version of Crysis Warhead would take that long either. Either way by the time Crysis 3 is due I'm sure that Crytek will have a whole new stepping stone for the PC community. ;)
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearlily
Joined: 09 13, 2011 /11:01
Posts: 20
Location:
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 29, 2011 /08:10 |
|
I bought Warhead on my PC a few days ago, but I've yet to install it. How bad is the activation system in it?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
bigboulder
Joined: 06 28, 2010 /08:12
Posts: 767
Location: Germany
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 10 31, 2011 /09:43 |
|
@ bearlily
activation system?
There is none
|
|
|
|
|
|
bearlily
Joined: 09 13, 2011 /11:01
Posts: 20
Location:
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 11 04, 2011 /11:44 |
|
There's an installation limit, right? Doesn't matter, I installed it and it ran like crap. Worse than Crysis 1 in fact. I'll play it next year when I buy a new PC.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
NANOPROv2
Joined: 09 23, 2011 /02:36
Posts: 81
Location: Canada
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 11 05, 2011 /09:08 |
|
You're right, but after making both crysis and crysis 2 on console, there's no way they won't make crysis 3 for console as well. Those PC gamers are just going to have to suck it up and understand that crytek realized they make more money off of consoles. But then again asking a PC gamer to calm down and stop trolling is like asking a crazy monkey not to rip your ears off.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
bigboulder
Joined: 06 28, 2010 /08:12
Posts: 767
Location: Germany
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 11 06, 2011 /02:54 |
|
@ NANOPROv2
I have nothing against console versions at all. But Crytek decided to release Crysis 2 with laughable textures and almost no options to config the game and no mod-tools. All the other AAA -multiplatformtitles did better since Crysis 2 came out. Battlefield 3 is remarkably better than the console versions for example. Or future titles like Skyrim: It will come out with mod tools from day 1. Batman Arkham City will have better textures and impressive physx effects etc. There will be no complains there because DICE, Bethesda and Rocksteady know how to please PC gamers.. Crytek provoked the reactions they received since the release of Crysis 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post subject: Re: Crysis Warhead on Consoles? Posted: 11 11, 2011 /06:36 |
|
Yeah Crysis 2 should've been released with the DirectX 11 feature instead of that being a patch "for the high-end community".
And yes Batman Arkham City looks beautiful on PC. Especially with PhysX on!
Bring Crysis Warhead to consoles Crytek! SOON!!!
|
|
|
|
|