Theres FFA. Its in the leak.

If ya ask me,they puted 6 vs. 6 Thing cause of two reasons:

1:It's because the grahic is really GREAT,and if they were to expand those maps to big maps like battlefield does,probably a lot of people would get big CPU lag's due to the great graphic enviroment around them,like some people did in some Crysis 1 maps.

2:They are just trying out a new thing.Let's say like CoD. In CoD you dont have big maps but still belive me many many many people like my self preffer that kind of gaming with close encounter,but ye,i think that they sould atleast make 2-3 big maps just in case.

Gameplay > Graphics. Especially if it comes down to stupid design decisions like these.

If they dont do something to change how the PC version is to the consoles then Crytek will just join the ranks of Infinity Ward and will be a joke in the eyes of the PC community. I wanted to get the Nano edition but I guess ill just look for those extras to be listed on ebay. We wont trust Crytek anymore just like we dont support Infinity Ward.

BF3 has annouced it will be able to do 64 player maps again, and it will be running the new frostbite engine. And (personaly) compared to the cryEngine is very similar.

So I am rather confused as to why they are setting this benchmark for crysis 2? 6v6 the idealism behind it, is sound - but won't hold up to the gaming community as a whole.

The games basis is around the cryEngine - wouldn't it make a more "crysis" experience to have even 16 v 16? Or 18 v 18?

I play a couple week ago COD:black ops in MP with a relative and didn't enjoy it so much. But it my personal filling and perhaps crysis 2 mp will be more fun.

The question of the size map is probably not due to Pc CPU because Battlefield 3 should normally run 32 or 64 players. For me, it's more a decision taking from doing an mp only with 6vs6 and no thinking more. On another hand creating an huge map should take time and money and crytek has perhaps determined than consoles would not run nicely an such map so it would be too much work for Pc only.

Having 2-3 big map would effectively be nice but I believe it's more dreaming because decision was made early in development. I think even having some big maps composed in part with elements from some small maps will be fine but I'm not waiting on such reversal.

I would have said "Because Crysis had it Crysis 2 will has it, too"...
I've never played the leak or watched any videos of it because I don't want to spoil me the fun so I couldn't know that ^^

From the news announcement of the multi-platform demo.

Instant Action = FFA.