Post a reply Post a new topic Previous topic | Next topic      Page 7 of 11      1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: 09 23, 2011 /02:36

Posts: 81

Location: Canada
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /03:23 

yeah, you can't compare engines, the only thing you can do, and what everyone IS doing right now, is comparing the GAMES graphics. Frostbite 2 is still brand new, and only has one game to feature its' engine. Wait a while then you can compare the GAMES graphics.


   

User avatar

Joined: 03 29, 2011 /09:26

Posts: 1308

Location:
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /03:24 

NANOPROv2 wrote:
Damn, you're actually right. The coding makes the engine, not the engine aesthetic appearence, well i guess everyone can shut up now;)

The art direction needs to be applied, if the engine is frumpy it ain't gonna happen, luckily the CryEngine3 ain't frumpy.
We obviously know the answer to the OPs question but lets keep evolving and tell me how the next Metro game is gonna look and the release date i forgot.


   

User avatar

Joined: 09 23, 2011 /02:36

Posts: 81

Location: Canada
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /03:25 

Art direction is just your opinion, and i'm getting arkham city for xmas! but on my ps3, 'cause no one plays a BATMAN game for graphics, at least i don't.


   

User avatar

Joined: 09 23, 2011 /02:36

Posts: 81

Location: Canada
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /03:26 

Well ART direction needs to applied to anything and everything! How else to u design game levels before MAKING them in the game.


   

User avatar

Joined: 03 29, 2011 /09:26

Posts: 1308

Location:
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /03:30 

NANOPROv2 wrote:
Well ART direction needs to applied to anything and everything! How else to u design game levels before MAKING them in the game.

It ain't possible to paint a Leonardo De Vinci with crayons, if you get my meaning.
If you drive a three wheeler bubble car, you ain't gonna plan for a day at the races, if a decent game takes a decade to make on a certain engine cause it's a slow cow don't matter how good it looks the content will be dated.


   

User avatar
Community Veteran


Joined: 06 11, 2010 /04:10

Posts: 3906

Location: United Kingdom
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /04:26 

I wonder could Crytek make BF3 with Cryengine 3.... And could Dice make Crysis 2 with Frostbite 2?

Honestly I think Crytek would have the easier job? No?
And which version of each game would be better optimised?


   

User avatar

Joined: 01 13, 2011 /09:58

Posts: 4165

Location: Australia
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 09, 2011 /07:16 

Said it once and I'll say it again, XRay engine is superior to every other engine


   

User avatar

Joined: 06 19, 2011 /11:29

Posts: 37

Location: India
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 10, 2011 /04:48 

M4dn3ss wrote:
Said it once and I'll say it again, XRay engine is superior to every other engine


Cryengine 3 is better than XRay engine


   

User avatar

Joined: 06 19, 2011 /11:29

Posts: 37

Location: India
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 10, 2011 /04:55 

NANOPROv2 wrote:
YEAH! your so right! and by "in the future" we only have to wait 'till Warface comes out! Think about! it's a PC exclusive, using cryengine 3, so it'll be making the most of the engine! We all know PC has the best graphics, so crytek are making warfare pc exclusive, that mean that they don't have any reason to hold back the graphics of the engine on the PC!



This person gets the meaning of what i meant to say. Have any one of you played crysis 2 it says in the starting ACHEIVED WITH CRYENGINE 3. Thats what i am trying to say. Only talk about what has been achieved and not what has to be achieved. Maybe cryengine 3 would be better than frostbite 2 when we come to the true potential but simply that hasnt been proved yet. The true potential of either of the two engines has been achieved yet. Currently things that have been achieved with frostbite 2 are far superior to thing which have been achieved by cryengine 3 in most of the terms. Thats because DICE focused on making a PC game and porting it to consoles. Crytek didnt thought like that. When it releases its next PC exclusive then maybe they would try to make the best out of cryengine 3 and beat frostbite 2 in all terms and emerge out to be THE WORLD'S BEST ENGINE. But currently that hasnt been proved.


   

User avatar

Joined: 06 19, 2011 /11:29

Posts: 37

Location: India
 Post subject: Re: Is Frostbite 2 better than cryengine 3
PostPosted: 12 10, 2011 /04:59 

SLI-756 wrote:


CatWoman Arkham City Extreme Pie Dx11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPe9F2yRC4w

One of the First levels of the Beautiful Batman AC, IMO Best Art Design 2011, lovely effects in this game like streamers trailing off batarang black & red in later levels.
Detail @ Extreme.


are you here to advertise about Batman Arkham city. This is not a forum to advertise to things but compare engines. Most of your posts are trying to show batman arkham city better than crysis 2 and battlefield 3. But i know that is not the truth. arkham city city sux according to me.


   

  Previous topic | Next topic      Page 7 of 11      1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  


Jump to: