I think it still gonna use crytek home grown anti cheat.Maybe a bit better one.Seriously PB is a major selling point of any online FPS game.EA surely won't let that slip in there marketing.Since they are yet to mention of any anti-cheat chances of it not using PB is really high.

If they use an anti hack I really hoep it´s not PB. All it does is detect known public hacks, so private hacks people create just for themselves of those that are sold are never detected. Also hacks can be modified to scape PB´s detection.

Anything would be better than what they currently use

Poor Crytek getting blamed for weak people...

PB is great, but PB won't mean anything if the game is open and exploitable! Crytek needs to secure the game and make more things server side. That is a bit hard to do it when a game is fast-paced like C3 and has mod tools!

And the reason they are not mentiong anti-cheats is cause anti-cheat integration is still far away! MOH:W announced the PB integration only 2 months before the release

Crytek's "home grown anti cheat" is this:
> Ask for high quality video proof
> Watch video
> Guess whether the players' kills are looking suspicious or not
> Ban the player based on that
> That's enough work for today, back to development of a sequel for the next 3 months

There is no ant-cheat. There never has been. If there was you would simply be able to submit the name of the player and the time when it happened, Crytek would be able to do the rest based on tracking/logging systems.

But instead they ask for high quality VIDEO PROOF which blows my mind because they're just assuming people have the hardware, time, connection speed, etc to record and upload 720p/1080p videos just to report a single cheater? Sorry, but I'm in my right to call that a pile of garbage, why do the players have to do the majority of the work and Crytek with all their "anti-cheat tools" just boils down to watching video footage and clicking the ban button?

I mean look at this:

Hahaha "tracking logs", what a load of rubbish. There are no tracking logs, there is no system. There is no other explanation why they would ask for video proof, there is no other reason they would players to do 99% of their work for them.

Well they should have a decent enough pc to play in HD which is HQ, unless all the elitists are liars *whistle*

There is a tracking system, however, it's very bad. That's why they ask for the server name and time. They can also check tactical replays. They want HQ videos so they are sure the gameplay is not fake!

What does that even mean o_O

They need to make sure the video is 100% legit and not edited in any way