I have a propitiation: why not allow us to change scope & barrel attachments in-match (if we have unlocked them of course) just like in single player.

I know that in single player we can change every attachments and not just scope & barrel but that in multiplayer that would be problematic, especially when it comes to under-barrel attachments (grenade launcher, Gauss, shotgun).
Anyone that has unlocked those attachments would in fact be able to switch between them and become way too powerful both in therms of damage, ammo supply, and role versatility.
Also veterans of Cryis 3 will always have advantages over newcomers thanks to this in a very unbalancing way.
Scopes/sights & suppressors on the other hand don't unbalance the game so much because they don't give you advantages, not as much as under-barrel attachments anyway.
They will indeed allow us to adapt better to the situation in each match but this for me will add variety and challenge in good ways.

You might ask: after dying what attachment do I have on my gun? The one I started with at the beginning of the match, or the last one I equipped?
To solve this I imagined that we could select a "permanent attachment" of our choice among the ones you have unlocked for both scope & barrel and we would always spawn/re-spawn with that.
To use the other unlocked attachments we would have to switch in-match.

Please share your thoughts and remember this is just my opinion.

P.S.
I added a poll about this, just in case.

In-game weapon customization exactly like Single Player.

Yes please.

^^^
Well not exactly, that would be too much and negate any class/role in Crysis 3 but if we can change scope & barrel attachments you get a good 75% of the single player customization...not bad.

I never understood why we can't customize weapons in MP just like single player. There is already the perfect mechanism in place to do it. I'd love to run around with my DSG reflex, spot someone across the map, switch to sniper scope and take them out. that would be awesome.

^^^
Oh!
Where did you find it?
Anyway Crytek already has some feedback on this matter with this thread.

In case Cytek need more feedback on which direction to take I have added an option to the poll (you might want to re vote guys) and I have edited the title of the thread to accommodate my new-found knowledge.

That is friggin awesome! My hype for the game rose again. February couldn't be coming any slower...

beat me to the punch, i started a thread about this when that interview first went up.
i was very surprised there wasn't a bit more interest in it, huge step in the right direction.

I still think it would be better not to have access to all the under-barrel attachments in-match BUT maybe I am worrying for nothing.
Anyway I put all the options "on the table" so Crytek can see what we think and then decide what they deem best for Crysis 3 balance.

If they're gonna keep it fast paced with small maps like Crysis 2, it's pointless IMO. Why? Well, in these kind of games such as Crysis 2 or CoD you always pick a class and keep it like that the whole time, while in games such as Crysis 1 you have to adapt depending on your situation and how the match is going.

That's just me, though...