Dear crytek, the first gameplay footage of crysis3 looks truly amazing!!! Many people are terribly wrong- thinking the ps3 has better hardware... NO! its less powerful than the 360! The xbox360 can do over 500. 000. 000 million polygons while the ps3 only does 250.000.000 million polygons! More polygons= more Details= better graphics! The 360 has twice the polygon power of a ps3! Same with RAM texture memory 360 has 512mb +10 extra for AA, the ps3 has only 256mb for graphics, the other 256mb are not available for graphics its just for media downloads. The xbox360 has 3 real main cores each with 3,2 ghz and 2 threads per core! It can do 2 operations at the same time callled multi-threading! The PS3 has only 1 real main core! not 7 or 8! 1 core clocked at 3,2 ghz the other 6 sub cores are threads not real cores so its 1 real main core with 6 threads!The 360 also does more shaders and uses a better shader system than the PS3. The Xbox 360 is able to do real hardware tesselation. It gives textures depth and profile its way more advanced than the simple normal maps. which have no depth at all. crysis1 on 360 features tesselation so i know you can do it again crytek, give the xbox360 version the love it deserves and make it the best looking game ever made! or else i would be deeply disappointed... crysis it was love at first shot;)

from the interviews that I have seen/read is sounds exactly like what they want to achieve. I am glad the consoles are not taking a back seat to the PC and are shooting to push the 360 to it's limits. Developers have had 7 years to get used to the 360 so we should be seeing the best from these developers and Crytek seems very serious and intent on doing this. I am very excited for this game a year seems like a long time, I hope they keep news trickling out.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/34 ... ne-before/

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012- ... 3-xbox-360

http://www.ign.com/articles/2010/08/26/xbox-360-vs-playstation-3-the-hardware-throwdown

Just found this... I always thought IGN was on the 360 bandwagon but maybe they can't deny the truth. Just a thought.

sorry buddy but this article is terribly wrong!!! here we go again... games are made with polygons not Tflops! xbox360 does over 500.000.000 million polygons the PS3 does only 250.000.000 million polys. so the 360 has twice the polygon power of a ps3! more polygons= more details= better graphics!!! you can google it if you dont believe me but i am telling you facts not opinions! look at the games...gears of war 3 , the witcher 2, forza 4, crysis 1 u 2 i could go on forever but.. thing is they always look and run better on 360!

How about Battlefield 3? The 360 has jaggies all over the place, its missing tons of effects the PS3 has and runs smoother. The SPUs on the PS3 is where it has the advantage. Third party games most of the time look better on 360 because that's what they code it for. If the used the PS3 to lead the build it would be a different story. Crysis 2 runs smoother yes but it only looks sharper because they had to upscale the PS3 port to support the 1080p that the ps3 has opposed to the 720p that 360 is capable of. Just my opinion..

You the same Alcatraz from UT? dude if its you send me a friends request, Gamertag: Ceph Walka

-Ceph Walka

Ever heard of paragraphs? you should try it sometimes xD

Couldn't bear reading this sorry XD

Everyone, the Xbox 360 is the most dated console and is the worse, the only hope for a perdy crysis that runs great is the next gen

Even though it 'isn't' possible hardware wise they have apparantly found ways of introducing more advanced rendering options to 360... if the performance hit isn't to bad(plz no more slow downs) they have no reason to not include it